Bug#1002060: liblunar-date-doc: missing Breaks+Replaces: liblunar-date-dev (<< 3)

[肖盛文]

Hi Andreas,

在 2021/12/22 03:53, Andreas Beckmann 写道:

Hi,


  install liblunar-date-2.0-0
  install liblunar-date-3.0-1
  remove liblunar-date-3.0-1

another issue I noticed in liblunar-date-3.0-1: It is missing a corresponding Breaks to the existing Replaces. Without it the following sequence will result in liblunar-date-2.0-0 having lost all its lunar-date.mo files, while dpkg considers it correctly installed.

Add a corresponding Breaks to the existing Replaces is better.

I used Replaces before, so dpkg considers liblunar-date-2.0-0 correctly installed after liblunar-date-3.0-1 removed. If liblunar-date-2.0-0 lost all its lunar-date.mo files, the liblunar-date-2.0-0 will become not completeness, so liblunar-date-2.0-0 and liblunar-date-3.0-1 should not to co-install in the same system.

I would also recommend to use
Breaks+Replaces: liblunar-date-2.0-0 (<< 3)


Andreas

in case lunar-date needs to be updated in stable at some point, because the (<= 2.4.0-8) will no longer be sufficient in this case.

Do it in salsa git.


Thanks again!

--
肖盛文 xiao sheng wen Faris Xiao
微信(wechat)：atzlinux
《铜豌豆 Linux》https://www.atzlinux.com
基于 Debian 的 Linux 中文 桌面 操作系统
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=atzlinux%40sina.com
GnuPG Public Key: 0x00186602339240CB

It's a very experienced recommend. Even that lunar-date in stable has seldom chance to update.

OpenPGP_0x00186602339240CB.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key

OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature