Bonsoir,
I am still discovering the toolchain so some bugs might be false
positives...
Here it was ROCm having some cmake bugged, that was not correctly finding
the llvm directories and I got it solved.
But shouldn't this library be accessible to the public in a standard
directory?
BR, Maxime
On 1/7/22 19:43, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
Bonjour,
Could you please provide a test case to reproduce this easily ?
Thanks
S
Le 07/01/2022 à 19:26, Maxime Chambonnet a écrit :
Package: libclang-common-13-dev
Version: libclang-common-13-dev
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: max...@maxzor.eu
Hello,
The linker does not find the static lib,
which is installed by this package in
/usr/lib/llvm-13/lib/clang/13.0.0/lib/linux/libclang_rt.builtins-x86_64.a
Is there something missing?
BR, Maxime
-- System Information:
Debian Release: bookworm/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 5.15.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/16 CPU threads)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_WARN
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8),
LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
Versions of packages libclang-common-13-dev depends on:
pn lib32gcc-s1 <none>
pn lib32stdc++6 <none>
ii libc6 2.33-1
pn libc6-i386 <none>
ii libgcc-s1 11.2.0-13
pn libllvm13 <none>
ii libstdc++6 11.2.0-13
libclang-common-13-dev recommends no packages.
libclang-common-13-dev suggests no packages.
