On Thu, 2022-06-09 at 10:47 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > > I think there one more *test* issue, the first test in src:luajit > doens't explicitly declare dependencies, which means it implicitly has > has '@'. Quoting [1]: > > > Which means that autopkgtest asks apt to make sure all packages from > src:luajit are installed, but the dependency tree of bin:luajit > conflicts with some. This can be solved by only depending on luajit, as > that pulls in the required packages anyways. >
Yes. The libluajit-5.1-common has conflicts. Fixed in git: https://salsa.debian.org/lua-team/luajit/-/commit/0489ec840f2ab240785ecd8190962cb779858c29 > lua-moses autopkgtest failure [2] looks bad (still a segmentation fault): > autopkgtest [07:20:14]: test command9: luajit debian/tests/simple.lua > autopkgtest [07:20:14]: test command9: [----------------------- > bash: line 1: 1240 Segmentation fault bash -ec 'luajit > debian/tests/simple.lua' 2> >(tee -a > /tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.u7chaju_/downtmp/command9-stderr >&2) > >(tee -a > /tmp/autopkgtest-lxc.u7chaju_/downtmp/command9-stdout) > autopkgtest [07:20:14]: test command9: -----------------------] There are some compilation flags tweakable. I'll try with qemu to see whether I can make it work.