Hi Daniel, * Daniel Leidert wrote on Sat, May 06, 2006 at 03:26:06PM CEST: > Package: automake1.9 > Version: 1.9.6-4
> I may be wrong, but only using man_MANS has no effect on the resulting > Makefile. The related targets are not created. When I instead use > > manx_MANS (x=0-9) > > the resulting Makefile.in contains all targets to read and install > manpage (e.g. install-manx, uninstall-manx, MANS, ...) determined by > manx_MANS and(!) man_MANS. So for me it seems, there must be a bug. Could you supply a small example that exposes the bug you see, and stating what behavior you expect? You know that when using man_MANS (as opposed to numbered man<N>_MANS) the man pages have to have a correctly numbered extension, as documented in the manual? Cheers, Ralf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
