Am Samstag, den 06.05.2006, 16:52 +0200 schrieb Ralf Wildenhues: > * Daniel Leidert wrote on Sat, May 06, 2006 at 03:26:06PM CEST: > > Package: automake1.9 > > Version: 1.9.6-4 > > > I may be wrong, but only using man_MANS has no effect on the resulting > > Makefile. The related targets are not created. When I instead use > > > > manx_MANS (x=0-9) > > > > the resulting Makefile.in contains all targets to read and install > > manpage (e.g. install-manx, uninstall-manx, MANS, ...) determined by > > manx_MANS and(!) man_MANS. So for me it seems, there must be a bug. > > Could you supply a small example that exposes the bug you see, and > stating what behavior you expect?
As a small example for what I tried: man_src = \ foo.1.xml \ bar.1.xml \ lib.3.cml man_MANS = $(patsubst %.xml,%,$(man_src)) [..] And I thought, that man_MANS therefor is foo.1 bar.1 lib.3. But nothing happens and the Makefile does not show MANS nor install/uninstall targets. But adding a target all-local: $(man_MANS) shows, that man_MANS has the right content. > You know that when using man_MANS > (as opposed to numbered man<N>_MANS) the man pages have to have a > correctly numbered extension, as documented in the manual? Yes. But maybe, what I try is just impossible. Is it? If yes or if I missed an important information, please excuse this entry. Regards, Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]