Michael, Thanks.
On Wed, Aug 03, 2022 at 10:11:29AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > > I have an alternative approach that I would be grateful for your thoughts > > and > > opinion on: all packages (systemd included) use the > > systemd-standalone-tmpfiles > > implementation and that is the dependency that debhelper generates if a > > tmpfiles > > snippet is present. > > > > What do you think? > > No, that would be a bad idea since systemd already ships its own, preferred > implementation. Is there a difference between the built-in and standalone implementation other than the packaging? > We won't penalize systemd users I wouldn't want to penalize anybody. Thanks and best wishes Mark
