Hi, On Thu, Dec 1, 2022 at 1:59 AM Adam Borowski <kilob...@angband.pl> wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 08:52:48PM +0800, Bo YU wrote: > > * Package name : jamulus > > Version : 3.9.1+dfsg-1 > > Upstream contact : https://sourceforge.net/p/llcon/discussion/ > > * URL : https://jamulus.io/ > > * License : GPL-2.0+ and MIT-STK, CC0, GPL-2.0+, BSD3-OPUS, > > famfamfam-flag-icons > > * Vcs : > > https://evolvis.org/plugins/scmgit/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=alioth/jamulus.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/master > > Section : sound > > > jamulus (3.9.1+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=medium > > . > > * QA upload. > > * Set Debian QA as maintainer. See #1023670. > > * New upstream version 3.9.1. > > * Update d/copyright: > > - adjust Files-Excluded due to repack. > > - update file-pattern due to upstream change. > > * Add support for riscv64. (Closes: #1024984) > > * Rebase all patches. > > * Adjust d/source/lintian-overrides > > * Update execute_after_dh_auto_install > > Hi! > > .--====[ debian/source/lintian-overrides ] > # old repo > jamulus source: orphaned-package-not-maintained-in-debian-infrastructure > `---- > > This is not a false positive -- an orphaned package's packaging repo is > supposed to be moved to some place that's writeable by people other than > the previous maintainer.
Yes. I think the *right* place is debian namespace on salsa. But I do not have writable permission about it, so I did not change vcs field. In fact I put it under my namespace on salsa when packaging. > > Of course, there's no need to fix everything, especially not in a QA upload > where the only expectation is for the new version to be better than the old > one -- but hiding issues is no good. Agree. I do not intend to hide the issue here just think the lintian error is a false positive in this case.:). Another factor is that from uploading myself packages experience, lintian error will not be accepted even lintian warning by my sponsor. So I have to try to erase it. The most challenge to updating it for me is repacking it to obey DFSG. The workflow for such packages is unclear to me. But I have mastered some points from the package. Thanks again for pointing it. I saw Boyuan[0] has helped to upload the package to Debian archive. So I think I can close the reportbug. BR, Bo [0]: https://tracker.debian.org/news/1392012/accepted-jamulus-391dfsg-1-source-into-unstable/ > > > Meow! > -- > ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ > ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ > ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ Quis trollabit ipsos trollos? > ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀