On Wednesday, December 7, 2022 4:12:09 A.M. CST Bas Couwenberg wrote: > Package: ftp.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: ftp.debian....@packages.debian.org > Usertags: remove > X-Debbugs-Cc: digi...@packages.debian.org > Control: affects -1 + src:digikam > Control: block 1025671 by -1 > > Please remove digikam from the architectures where marble is not available.
I don't understand this request -- digikam appears to be built on those three architectures. Where's the problem?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
