* Andreas Fester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-13 15:33]: > > Even better would be to check with gcc-4.0 because that would mean you > > could drop the explicit build-dependency completely. > > but that is what Stephen actually did some time ago, and > the build failed ... that was the reason why I retained > the explicit build dependency on gcc-3.4 ...
Yes, but from reading the bug log of that gcc-4.0 bug it seems it has been fixed in the meantime. I could be wrong though. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
