On Sat, May 13, 2006 at 03:40:26PM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Andreas Fester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-05-13 15:33]: > > > Even better would be to check with gcc-4.0 because that would mean you > > > could drop the explicit build-dependency completely. > > > > but that is what Stephen actually did some time ago, and > > the build failed ... that was the reason why I retained > > the explicit build dependency on gcc-3.4 ... > > Yes, but from reading the bug log of that gcc-4.0 bug it seems it has > been fixed in the meantime. I could be wrong though.
I'll check into it again. -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
