Hello Petter On Mon, 2023-02-06 at 08:20 +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > Because of issues with the opensnitch build and test, I noticed the > Debian buildds only build bpfcc on a limited set of architectures. > Is > it written down somewhere why so few of the Debian architectures are > listed as working with bpfcc? Any chance to increase the list to all > supported Debian architectures?
I don't recollect if the list of supported architecture is mentioned somewhere, but I restricted the build to some of the 64 Bit architectures only, because of the lack of upstream support. I personally enabled bpfcc on some extra (64 bit) architectures back then but learnt that the upstream support is only focused on x86. Things may have changed lately as I am not on top of the bpfcc development upstream. I would love to extend the architecture support. If you already have changes that enable additional architectures, an MR will be appreciated. Preferably, first we should let it soak/reside, for 1-2 upstream releases, under Debian Experimental. -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part