On Tue, 2023-02-14 at 13:22 +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > > I don't recollect if the list of supported architecture is > > mentioned > > somewhere, but I restricted the build to some of the 64 Bit > > architectures only, because of the lack of upstream support. > > OK. What do 'upstream support' mean here, and did they list > supported > platforms anywhere?
By 'upstream support', I meant based on random conversations I had with them years ago. So, for curiosity, I did a quick check on where packaging in general stands. We have: * https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1880777 * https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/bcc/blob/rawhide/f/bcc.spec * https://github.com/iovisor/bcc/issues/2678 * https://repo.iovisor.org/yum/ * https://repo.iovisor.org/apt/ -- Ritesh Raj Sarraf | http://people.debian.org/~rrs Debian - The Universal Operating System
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
