(Sorry, I have forgotten to answer this) El 09/06/23 a las 15:35, Antoine Beaupré escribió: > [adding package maintainer to CC] > > On 2023-05-17 10:50:34, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 08:58:01AM +0000, Holger Levsen wrote: > >> On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 10:08:52AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > >> > > ISC is not longer maintaing any of the components of isc-dhcp (client, > >> > > I propose to mark it as unsupported. Or at least, limited, if we still > >> > > have hope in those security update exceptions they claim they could do. > >> [...] > >> > It's not a service to our users to claim that we will not support them. > >> [...] > >> > But I'm afraid that we will have to keep maintaining those for the > >> > benefit > >> > of our stable/oldstable (and even ELTS) users. I'm pretty sure that all > >> > the other distributions will also continue to maintain those packages for > >> > the lifetime of their respective releases so that we will have > >> > opportunities to share the workload and patches.
Yeah, you are right. Sorry for my not-very-clever message, maybe due to my disappointment of this deprecation. > > > > Agreed. > > > >> Given what Raphael wrote, should this bug maybe be about marking isc-dhcp > >> unsupported in trixie? > > > > My take would be to mark it as unsupported after the trixie development > > cycle > > has started (this flags awareness, but has no impact on stable releases) > > and then revisit the support situation before the trixie freeze (Kea might > > be > > a full replacment by then or maybe it turns out the patch support is ensured > > despite upstream's EOL) > > I think this is important enough to warrant an entry in the release > notes. I started working on something to that effect here: > > https://salsa.debian.org/ddp-team/release-notes/-/merge_requests/194 > > Hopefully that makes sense here? > Thanks Antoine for start working on the MR. Cheers, -- S
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
