Hi, Sebastien Delafond <s...@debian.org> writes:
> On 15/03 22:45, Nicholas D Steeves wrote: >> While triaging bugs I just noticed this one is marked fixed but is >> still open. Was it left open as a reminder to backport bullseye's >> org-mode? > > I believe that was the rationale at the time. > >> Does arch:all elpa-org-mode need a formal bpo, or will adding testing >> or sid apt source in combination with pinning work well enough? > > Package pinning should work fine, but if enough users request a proper > stable backport I guess it could also be maintained. Bookworm has been released, which means bullseye-backports will probably be winding down in a year. Meanwhile, no one requested an org-mode formal backport in three years, so I think it's safe to close this bug. Regards, Nicholas
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
