Am 07.11.2023 um 10:58 schrieb Matthew Vernon <matt...@debian.org>: > do feel free to propose some text for them).
How would be the proper way to do so? > If you find future init scripts missing that aren't in > orphan-sysvinit-scripts and the relevant package maintainer isn't willing to > restore them, do file a bug report (ideally with the requested details from > the README - https://salsa.debian.org/matthew/orphan-sysvinit-scripts/ ) > against o-s-s and we can get them into trixie. > > I had thought we'd caught nearly all of the scripts from bookworm, but if > there are missing ones there we could try and get a fix into the next point > release. Thank you. For the time being, I'm reluctant to go through the same chore again anytime soon. > [are we at the point where this bug report can be closed? From my side: Yes. Q: Should I open up a proper bug report to make o-s-s not a recommended but a hard dependency package? Or is this discussion enough that this will be triggered by the SysVinit maintainers? :wq! PoC
