Hi Dirk, On 16-06-2024 2:42 p.m., Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
I may need a hgand with riscv64.
That's normally a question to the porters, in CC now, so they can have a look.
The 1.34-1 revision needed some build changes I had done poorly in such a way that the -O0 no longer applied to some arches, this has been fixed in 1.34-2 so armel, armhf, i386 are good. But riskv64 still times out.
Ack.
Can we expand the build-time window from the (arguably already large) value?
Not that I know of.
Or can we (worst case) turn riskv64 builds off?
That's up to you as a maintainer, but this should be last resort [1]. Don't forget to request for removal of the existing riscv64 binaries if you go this route. Please be aware of [2] if you aren't already.
Paul[1] https://release.debian.org/testing/rc_policy.txt : Packages must be supported on as many architectures as is *reasonably* possible. (Emphasis mine).
[2] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2022/09/msg00105.html
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
