hi, On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 7:16 AM Bo YU <tsu.y...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 6:41 AM Dirk Eddelbuettel <e...@debian.org> wrote: > > > > > > Hi Paul, > > > > Thanks for the prompt and detailed reply. > > > > On 16 June 2024 at 16:13, Paul Gevers wrote: > > | Hi Dirk, > > | > > | On 16-06-2024 2:42 p.m., Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > > | > I may need a hgand with riscv64. > > | > > | That's normally a question to the porters, in CC now, so they can have a > > | look. > > | > > | > The 1.34-1 revision needed some build > > | > changes I had done poorly in such a way that the -O0 no longer applied > > to > > | > some arches, this has been fixed in 1.34-2 so armel, armhf, i386 are > > good. > > | > But riskv64 still times out. > > | > > | Ack. > > | > > | > Can we expand the build-time window from the > > | > (arguably already large) value? > > | > > | Not that I know of. > > | > > | > Or can we (worst case) turn riskv64 builds > > | > off? > > | > > | That's up to you as a maintainer, but this should be last resort [1]. > > | Don't forget to request for removal of the existing riscv64 binaries if > > | you go this route. Please be aware of [2] if you aren't already. > > > > True true, and I think I had to pull this 'safety value' once or twice > > before > > with challenging / large package. I will re-read [1] and [2] and ponder. > > > > riscv64 porters: I would of course also love to hear if you can offer any > > advice. The package is a tricky one as it contains (a lot of) heavily > > templated C++ code that is autogenerated via Swig for these Python > > bindings. The compilation of that one file is tricky. > >
I am always trying to build it on my local Unmatched boards with many attempts. But unfortunately, they all failed so far and each building will last > 1d.:( But this does not mean it does not work on riscv. On sg2042, it can be built: ``` Build Architecture: riscv64 Build Type: binary Build-Space: 1463468 Build-Time: 21213 Distribution: unstable Host Architecture: riscv64 Install-Time: 88 Job: /home/vimer/ftbfs/quantlib-swig/quantlib-swig_1.34-2.dsc Lintian: warn Machine Architecture: riscv64 Package: quantlib-swig Package-Time: 21368 Source-Version: 1.34-2 Space: 1463468 Status: successful Version: 1.34-2 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Finished at 2024-06-19T21:08:10Z Build needed 05:56:08, 1463468k disk space ``` I am looking at other optimization methods, but this will take more time again. BR, Bo > Okay, I will have a look at this package. > > After a quick look, there are a lot of architecture-related build > flags here, so I might start there first. > > BR, > Bo > > Best, Dirk > > > > | Paul > > | > > | [1] https://release.debian.org/testing/rc_policy.txt : Packages must be > > | supported on as many architectures as is *reasonably* possible. > > | (Emphasis mine). > > | [2] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2022/09/msg00105.html > > | [DELETED ATTACHMENT OpenPGP_signature.asc, application/pgp-signature] > > > > -- > > dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org > >
