Control: retitle -1 geany: consider bumping ABI Control: severity -1 important
On Sun, Aug 18, 2024 at 10:53:24PM +0200, Enrico Tröger wrote: > So I'm not totally sure but to me it seems like renaming geany to geany-t64 > is the way. For library packages, the rename was useful. For things like an IDE, renaming is not the correct path forward. IMO there is no need for a rename. > As far as I know, the geany package is required only by the geany-plugins > package and they are usually released together by upstream. > So I guess it might be no issue even if not renamed. I think bumping the ABI to be on the safe side would be a good idea. Practically, given geany -and- the plugins seem to depend on glib2.0, which itself was renamed for t64, I suppose one cannot produce a system where geany is still the pre-t64 ABI and a plugin is post-t64 or vice versa. Reducing the bug report severity as there is probably no practical problem. Chris
