On Tue, Aug 20, 2024 at 01:28:45PM +0200, Stefano Brivio wrote: > > Was this before or after the time64 (and implicit LFS) transition? > > It turns out it was before that, and things actually started failing > now, so I just posted a patch for armhf: > > > https://archives.passt.top/passt-dev/20240819231529.1482175-1-sbri...@redhat.com/
Awesome, thanks so much! > I plan to make a new release and update the package soon (days to a > couple of weeks), then we can close this I guess. Perfect :) It's so convenient that you're both upstream, as well as the Debian maintainer for it, I hadn't realized this before this bug report! > Ah, yes, that topic just came up recently at > https://github.com/containers/podman/discussions/23558#discussioncomment-10334370. > > What we have upstream at the moment should actually cover multiple > architectures: > https://passt.top/passt/tree/test/distro > > those perform basic tests on a bunch of different architectures using > QEMU TCG, but they take quite some time to run, and it's difficult to > maintain them because those guest images disappear or change from time > to time, and there's no single distribution consistently shipping guest > images for all the architectures Debian supports. Nice. To debug i386 for the purposes of this bug, given there is no cloud image, I used debvm (apt install debvm), and debvm-create & debvm-run specifically. (Also thanks to Reinhard for reminding me of it). Perhaps you would find it useful for building & running images for these less common architectures? Regards, Faidon
