On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 03:02:59PM +0200, Antoine Le Gonidec wrote: > Please consider including play.it-community and play.it-vv221 in the > leaf packages (admittedly with a very low popcon). "Somewhat useful" or > not is the kind of judgement I am far too biased to make about these > packages.
We are talking mostly about packages that are outdated by 7-10 years, unmaintained both in practice (no uploads) and in theory (no formal maintainer). I used words "somewhat useful" for packages that can be installed and run (unlike some other packages that we also still have), I didn't try to estimate whether they are *actually useful to anyone*. > While they do not directly depend nor build-depend on Mono, they do > generate packages for the following (non-free, non-redistributable) > games, and the generated packages depend on both mono-runtime and a > handful of Mono libraries: Please keep packages you care about in a good shape in Debian. I assume you've read the past discussion in this bug and realize that even mono itself is unmaintained, very outdated and RC-buggy and package like it often miss stable releases even when they aren't removed from unstable. If by "a handful of Mono libraries" you mean libraries not built from src:mono please keep those in a good shape in Debian too (I would be surprised if all of them are still in debian though, as there are maybe 5 of such libraries in Debian). -- WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
