On Thu, 18 Jul 2024 08:46:00 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > On 17-07-2024 11:20 p.m., gregor herrmann wrote: > > So I guess I'd just wait (the new libxml-libxslt-perl version also > > has no groundbreaking changes); but I might miss something which > > others may add. > I think that's acceptable if only warnings are involved indeed.
Now we have libxml2 2.9 back in testing (2.12.7+dfsg+really2.9.14-0.1), and a libxml-libxml-perl which depends on this version and has been built against it, but the autopkgtest failures are still there: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/libxml-libxslt-perl with our friend Warning: program compiled against libxml 212 using older 209 I wonder what still was compiled against libxml2 2.12 … One guess is libxslt which hasn't seen any upload or binNMU since July. Maybe a binNMU of libxslt against libxml2 2.12.7+dfsg+really2.9.14-0.1 would help? Or maybe someone else has better ideas … Cheers, gregor -- .''`. https://info.comodo.priv.at -- Debian Developer https://www.debian.org : :' : OpenPGP fingerprint D1E1 316E 93A7 60A8 104D 85FA BB3A 6801 8649 AA06 `. `' Member VIBE!AT & SPI Inc. -- Supporter Free Software Foundation Europe `-
signature.asc
Description: Digital Signature
