On Mon, 30 Sep 2024 20:26:15 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:

> On 30-09-2024 00:14, gregor herrmann wrote:
> > >    Warning: program compiled against libxml 212 using older 209
> > Oh, that simple; somehow embarrassing that I missed this :)
> I didn't check what got implemented exactly (sorry I'm assuming wrongly or
> don't understand the problem), but I feel that a stricter dependency is only
> there to prevent the warning. I *think* the warning should be patched out
> instead and is a sign of the lack of proper SONAME bumping by upstream
> libxml.

I seem to remember that I also expressed my unhappiness about the
warning to the libxml2 maintainer but oh well …

> Although I recognize: pick your battles.

*nod*


Cheers,
gregor

-- 
 .''`.  https://info.comodo.priv.at -- Debian Developer https://www.debian.org
 : :' : OpenPGP fingerprint D1E1 316E 93A7 60A8 104D  85FA BB3A 6801 8649 AA06
 `. `'  Member VIBE!AT & SPI Inc. -- Supporter Free Software Foundation Europe
   `-   

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital Signature

Reply via email to