On Fri, 25 Jul 2025 01:01:13 +0200 Andreas Beckmann <[email protected]> wrote:
On 7/25/25 00:46, Santiago Vila wrote: > Ok, assuming none of the two packages will try to enter testing > before the release, I leave this to Timo, then.This needs to be fixed for trixie, we need the newer cccl in trixie otherwise we have an unsupported cccl+nvidia-cuda-toolkit combination in trixie. (Due to use of a wrong variable name the dependency was not bumped automatically in nvidia-cuda-toolkit, otherwise I would have noticed this earlier.)
Thanks, Santiago, for catching this, and thanks, Andreas, for looking up the fix. I'm going to apply it and request a last minute unblock.
If that does not work out, I agree with Andreas that it is more important for trixie to have a functional nvidia toolchain than stdgpu.
Cheers Timo -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ╭────────────────────────────────────────────────────╮ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ │ Timo Röhling │ ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ │ 9B03 EBB9 8300 DF97 C2B1 23BF CC8C 6BDD 1403 F4CA │ ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ ╰────────────────────────────────────────────────────╯
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
