> On Sun, Jul 09, 2006 at 06:56:51PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > >> AFAIK you are right, but at least the posted patch is bogus - is the > >> uploaded > >> version of the package fixed correctly? > > No, the patch is the same as the one in the package. Should I perhaps upload > > a new one with the right variable in front? :-) > > To be precise, I'm planning to re-NMU with the following patch (plus > changelog): > > diff -Nru /tmp/HhK0RQLpFe/fai-2.10.3/bin/faireboot > /tmp/1VWBHMzJD0/fai-2.10.4/bin/faireboot > --- /tmp/HhK0RQLpFe/fai-2.10.3/bin/faireboot 2006-07-09 15:54:54.000000000 > +0200 > +++ /tmp/1VWBHMzJD0/fai-2.10.4/bin/faireboot 2006-07-09 18:58:36.000000000 > +0200 > @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ > [ "X" == "X$SSH_CLIENT" -a "$TERM" != "dumb" ] && killall -q sshd > > fai-divert -R > -rm -f /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/10fai /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/90fai > +rm -f $FAI_ROOT/etc/apt/apt.conf.d/10fai $FAI_ROOT/etc/apt/apt.conf.d/90fai > > umount $FAI_ROOT/proc $FAI_ROOT/dev/pts > umount -ar > > Since the previous NMU seems to have gone a bit awry, I'd be glad if any of > you could verify it this time. :-) >
IHMO this one looks a lot better, but a tester would be welcome! Regards, Michael
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
