On Sun, Jul 09, 2006 at 06:56:51PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: >> AFAIK you are right, but at least the posted patch is bogus - is the uploaded >> version of the package fixed correctly? > No, the patch is the same as the one in the package. Should I perhaps upload > a new one with the right variable in front? :-)
To be precise, I'm planning to re-NMU with the following patch (plus changelog): diff -Nru /tmp/HhK0RQLpFe/fai-2.10.3/bin/faireboot /tmp/1VWBHMzJD0/fai-2.10.4/bin/faireboot --- /tmp/HhK0RQLpFe/fai-2.10.3/bin/faireboot 2006-07-09 15:54:54.000000000 +0200 +++ /tmp/1VWBHMzJD0/fai-2.10.4/bin/faireboot 2006-07-09 18:58:36.000000000 +0200 @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ [ "X" == "X$SSH_CLIENT" -a "$TERM" != "dumb" ] && killall -q sshd fai-divert -R -rm -f /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/10fai /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/90fai +rm -f $FAI_ROOT/etc/apt/apt.conf.d/10fai $FAI_ROOT/etc/apt/apt.conf.d/90fai umount $FAI_ROOT/proc $FAI_ROOT/dev/pts umount -ar Since the previous NMU seems to have gone a bit awry, I'd be glad if any of you could verify it this time. :-) /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
