On Tuesday 11 July 2006 11:36, Peter Van Eynde wrote: > Alle Sunday 09 July 2006 09:35, Peder Chr. Nørgaard ha scritto: > > Package: cl-asdf > > Version: 1.99-2 > > Severity: important > > > > I try to upgrade to 1.99-2, apt-get says: > > > > % apt-get install cl-asdf > > Reading package lists... Done > > Building dependency tree... Done > > The following packages will be REMOVED: > > sbcl-common > > The following packages will be upgraded: > > cl-asdf > > > > That cannot possibly be the intention. I think this is caused by the > > line > > Actually it is, but apt-get is a little stupid. aptitude noticed that > the new sbcl package now has a sbcl-doc and sbcl-source instead of > the sbcl-common package and it suggested me to upgrade sbcl. > > I'm guessing the line > > apt-get install cl-asdf sbcl sbcl-doc > > would give the same effect. > > The reason the conflict is there is to move the asdf info file from > the sbcl package (!) to the correct asdf package. >
OK, yes, I see. It wasn't easy to guess, and it was complicated by the fact that the new sbcl came out several days later than the cl-asdf that demanded the uninstallation of sbcl-common; I noticed that sbcl was stuck in NEW. Thanks for your answer, and please feel free to close the bug. best regards -- Peder Chr. Nørgaard e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gefionsvej 19 spejder-e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] DK-8230 Åbyhøj tel: +45 87 44 11 99 Denmark mob: +45 30 91 84 31