Sven Luther wrote: > On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 03:23:25AM +0100, Nikolaus Schulz wrote: > > Package: parted > > Version: 1.6.11-8 > > Please try parted 1.6.21-1, which is now in testing/unstable.
No difference in the documentation regarding hfs(plus). > > the info manual has been updated (see Bug #275650), but the package > > description(s) *ouch!* and README.Debian still say parted does not support > > HFS(plus) resizing. > > There is a bunch of changes in the upcoming 1.6.22 which includes the HFS > patch in the upstream tree, will see once this is released what we can do, if > not, patches are welcome. I think the documentation should be fixed in Sarge. Will Sarge release with parted 1.6.22? HFS is _the_ native PPC filesystem. Parted's package description really should be in sync with its major features. Why wait for 1.6.22 anyway? It's fairly trivial to fix that. > Even better, please check the parted CVS tree at > alioth (its the upstream one), Only debian/{control,README.Debian} are affected, it has nothing to do with upstream. > and propose patches to K.G. for the documentation if needed. Who's K.G.? Regards, Nikolaus P.S. Note this bug affects parted and libparted1.6-{12,i18n,dev,dbg,udeb}. I would have filed it against the parted source package, but how does one do that, when the binary and source package names are the same? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]