On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 09:17:41AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.09.07.0004 +0200]: > > Alternatively, something like: > > > > user [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > usertag 123456 + bsp-zurich-madduck > > > > and then search for bsp-zurich-* usertags. (I don't know if that's > > possible, though. Testing it out....) > > We know now this works, thanks for trying it out. Now let's figure > out which method to use. > > I am a little more for the first method because it contains the > unobfuscated email address of the claimer. Sure, if all we do is > prefix bsp-<city>-, the information is still there. > > Should I send a followup to > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00019.html and ask > for comments?
Yes, why not? Although having the unobfuscated email address (meaning the @debian.org address?) is not really a benefit, as you would then have no easy way of searching for it, whereas bsp-<city>-* is an easy pattern to search for. Julian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
