On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 11:46:33PM +0400, Norbert Preining wrote: > Hi all! > > I cannot actually check something since I am in Georgia and far away from any > of my computers, kut I have some questions/comments: > > ..... Original Message ....... > On Wed, 20 Sep 2006 12:07:33 +0200 "Frans Pop" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Looks like the 40jadetex.cnf.dpkg-new is there because jadetex cannot jet > >be configured and so the old version of the config file is still used. > > Yes, this is true, it seems to be like this. BUT: Why is the snippet at all > included in the fmtutil.cnf file??? The new update-* code ??? added (who was > it?) should make sure that the snippets with a .dpkg-new file are *not* > included.
It is (probably) not included. The problem is that the .dpkg-new one is te correct one in this case. Frank > > So could it be that tetex-* doesnt call update-fmtutil at the beginning of > the postinst script? this would explain why this happened, at least this is > my semi-qualified opinion from the crystal-ball ... > > Bye bye, I am back on Monday for checking stuff. > > Ahh yes Ralf: I assume that the original bug report did go to the maintainer. > What I dont understand is why the NMU is numbered -7? > > Best wishes > > Norbert > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Dr. Norbert Preining <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Università di > Siena > Debian Developer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Debian TeX Group > gpg DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 > B094 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- "Debugging is twice as hard as writing the code in the first place. Therefore, if you write the code as cleverly as possible, you are, by definition, not smart enough to debug it." - Brian W. Kernighan
