On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 00:29:23 +0200 Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 11:29:45PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> > There seems to be a little typo in section 9.1 _Best practices
> > for security review and design_:
[...]
> This has been fixed in CVS and in the 3.9 version I uploaded today.

Ah yes, I see.

> Thanks for the report, however,

You are welcome!  :)

> if you could foolproof the full manual I would really appreciate it

Well, I'm (slowly) reading it and I am reporting bugs whenever I see
something that doesn't look right...
I don't know if that fits your definition of foolproofing...  :p

Take into account that I am *not* a security guru, even though I am
interested in the topic.

> (but use the version published at the
> website, as it is built from the latest CVS sources and might be more
> up-to-date than the version distributed in the harden-doc package).

I am reading the online HTML version at
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/securing-debian-howto/index.en.html

I hope it's the one you're referring to...


-- 
But it is also tradition that times *must* and always
do change, my friend.   -- from _Coming to America_
..................................................... Francesco Poli .
 GnuPG key fpr == C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12  31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4

Attachment: pgp5RF0Boey4D.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to