Microsoft gets to claim it has offered something wonderful, but in reality no one can actually benefit from its pledge without ceasing to be a member of the FOSS community. But it's not a patent cross license. He was the CEO, the co-founder of the company to boot.
qqqqq *** CNHC *** CNHC *** CNHC *** Trade Date: Friday, November 24, 2006 Company: China Health Management Corp. Symbol: CNHC Price: $1.34 Target: $10 CNHC BREAKING NEWS: China Health Management Corp. Announces the Hospital's Setup Proposal Received Additional Approval from Kunming City, Yunnan, China CNHC IS BOUND TO BLOW UP! THIS AMAZING NEWS ALONG WITH HEAVY PR PROMOS ARE DRIVING IT NUTS! WATCH CNHC GO OFF THE CHAIN ON FRIDAY NOV 24! qqqqq So this is Novell speaking. Rather, his declaration is authorized by Novell and based on Novell's knowledge and understanding of the matters he addresses. They each pay each other millions. Microsoft promises not to sue Novell SUSE paid customers for using Novell SUSE. At least I hope some of you can attend. Once again we have to thank Laomedon for doing the OCR to text and HTML for us. It's also why Linux development was so much faster than proprietary software development ever can be. Do you prefer dying by swallowing a poison pill or by firing squad? Why does this matter? Love has done the honorable thing and told the truth. In neither case was he told to keep any of the code confidential or to return it or destroy it. The exhibits are two cases. What happened is this: when you attack Linux, people despise you and don't want to do business with you any more. Presumably, the proliferation of compatible open format alternatives will place added pressure on OOXML to become increasingly open and competitive in order to be relevant. Even if SCO were able to trot out Bryan Sparks, the other co-founder, Sparks was not CEO at the time of the Santa Cruz acquisition. I see no way to recover from his declaration, because there is no one who can convincingly contradict. Nobody on that side seems to have cared much about the end game. Here, Microsoft agrees not to sue you unless you do something useful. How do you like this sentence? That is one of the main purposes of putting software under the GPL in the first place. Why does this matter? But it's not a patent cross license. I started to remove all the names too, but then I realized that this is an Honor Roll. Microsoft must think that project failed because SCO bungled the job. Be sure to read the related article, Secret audit reveals massive CAN-SPAM violations by corporate America. It tickles my funny bone to see SCO on the receiving end of discovery motions to compel. IBM is seeking to impeach this expert witness. Anyone able to make sense of this gobbledygook? It tickles my funny bone to see SCO on the receiving end of discovery motions to compel. Microsoft gets to claim it has offered something wonderful, but in reality no one can actually benefit from its pledge without ceasing to be a member of the FOSS community. He was the CEO, the co-founder of the company to boot. When he told the reseller, the man informed him that the computer had been used in Bell Labs and it happened frequently that their computers would show up with Unix code still on them. I want to thank Laomedon for doing the work. The rules aim to curb advertising of junk food targeted toward children. Microsoft gets to claim it has offered something wonderful, but in reality no one can actually benefit from its pledge without ceasing to be a member of the FOSS community. I've redacted people's emails, as usual, as a kindness. The exhibits are two cases. And then Novell couldn't distribute all that GPL software it didn't write but wishes to control. So this is Novell speaking. That doesn't make it true. The parties stipulated to the change and asked for it, so that is the reason. If there is anything that speaks to the real purpose of this litigation, I'd say the carelessness is it. We saw the same flaw in the DaimlerChrysler and AutoZone cases, a lack of research to avoid bizarrely inappropriate allegations. IBM is seeking to impeach this expert witness. In neither case was he told to keep any of the code confidential or to return it or destroy it. Why does this matter? This is further, supplemental responses by SCO. I started to remove all the names too, but then I realized that this is an Honor Roll. Will the regulations make any impact? That doesn't make it true. Once again we have to thank Laomedon for doing the OCR to text and HTML for us. Both sides entered the courtroom kind of knowing they had some strengths and some definite weaknesses. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
