Also, sprach Timo Hoenig am Montag, den 27. November 2006 um 14:52:
> On Mon, 2006-11-27 at 14:44 +0100, Sebastian Fontius wrote:
> > Did I miss something?  The HAL in unstable is the same as in
> > testing so it should not be something only available in a new
> > version of HAL.
> 
> Can you please start everything as you would do normally and just
> kill the process hald-addmoin-acpi-buttons-toshiba?  Then, you
> should see FnFX getting all events, not just a few.

Ah, that way round :).  I already wondered...

If I only start fnfxd it works.  If I start dbus/HAL it starts again
missing key presses and if I kill hald-addon-acpi-toshiba it works
again (although I got the impression not 100%).  I moved
/usr/share/hal/fdi/policy/10osvendor/10-toshiba-buttons.fdi away and
restarted everything (dbus, HAL, fnfxd) and it works 100% again.  Cool
:).

> > I heard something like this.  Is this FIFO a normal FIFO akin to
> > the ones generated by mkfifo(1)?
> 
> No.  It is just that the kernel interface is implementing the event
> interface as such.  Thus, if you have more than one process using
> the interface you will see that one process gets event A, the other
> process event B and event C (just as an example).  It's racy, there
> should not be more than one process at a time reading from the event
> interface of the Toshiba ACPI driver.

Of course.  A simple fifo would be too easy ;).

So what should we do with this bug?  Reassign it to hal?  What does
hald-addon-acpi-toshiba do, anyway?  Things like the power or the lid
button work without special Toshiba kernel module magic IIRC (and are
handled by acpid directly on my system), so I do not see a point in
shipping hald-addon-acpi-toshiba altogether.  But of course I could be
mistaken.

Greetings and thanks again for the help,

-- 
: Sebastian Fontius : www.fsfe.org : www.fsfe.org/en/fellows/smc
`--------+----------+--------------+-----------------------------------.
    []   | "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little |
  [][][] |  temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."      |
    ||   :                                     Benjamin Franklin, 1759 :

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to