On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 09:47:44PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote: > * Mattia Dongili ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070108 17:27]: > > On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 09:46:22PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Package: acpica-unix > > > Version: 20060912-3.2 > > > Severity: important > > > > > > There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > > > > > > > Automatic build of acpica-unix_20060912-3.2 on bld-3 by sbuild/hppa 98 > > > > Build started at 20070106-1817 > > [...] > > > > # testcase > > > > /build/buildd/acpica-unix-20060912/debian/iasl/usr/bin/iasl -tc -p > > > > debian/acpi-dsdt.test.hex debian/acpi-dsdt.dsl > > > > make: *** [install] Bus error > > > > > > A full build log can be found at: > > > http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=hppa&pkg=acpica-unix&ver=20060912-3.2 > > > > I'd say it's a knwon and wanted side effect of #401153 and its solution: > > " > > acpica-unix (20060912-3.2) unstable; urgency=high > > > > * Non-maintainer upload with permission of the maintainer. > > * Re-Upload to unstable without further code changes. > > These changes make sure that the build succeds only on architectures > > where the binaries actually work for - FTBFS resulting from that are > > no regressions, but prevent us shiping broken packages. > > > > -- Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wed, 20 Dec 2006 07:53:24 +0000 > > Of course that is still a bug - "this package needs porting" basically. > Not really bad, but still something which would ne nice to be fixed.
Of course. I just wanted to have a reference to it in this bugreport :) -- mattia :wq! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
