On 05-Mar-26 00:02, Ben Burton wrote: > > > One solution which comes to my mind would be to make 'libgcj-dev' a real > > package like 'gcj' which is provided by 'gcc-defaults' and depends on > > the package from the current default gcc version. This would make a > > Build-Depends on just 'gcj, libgcj-dev' possible. > > Indeed, this would be preferable -- when you first filed this bug I took > a look in the hope that this was the case. Alas it was not. Perhaps > this is worth taking up with the gcc team?
I just found BTS #278105 which already requests a 'libgcj-dev' package to be added to 'gcc-defaults'. I will try to write a patch for 'gcc-defaults' which implements this. Regards Andreas Jochens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
