On 21.03.05 KatolaZ ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 09:09:07AM +0100, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
Hi, > > Thanks for the good bug report! As the bug still can be found in > > latest upstream (teTeX 3.0), I'll check the latest listings > > package ASAP and forward that bug to Carsten if still present. > > Unfortunately I don't speak Erlang so I can't check that bug for > > correctness. Can you assure, that the patch doesn't have unwanted > > side effects? > > Yes. The patch does not regard Erlang itself, but the way a > language is defined into the LaTeX "listing" package. Without this > patch, it is not possible to compile any .tex file which uses > listing with language set to "erlang". > Thanks for explanation. So the real mininmal example didn't really need the code lines, but rather a begin and an end of the lstlisting env. You just wanted to show us, what the effect of that bug is. Thanks! > [ Enzo Nicosia aka KatolaZ ---- LUG Catania -- Freaknet Medialab ] > Greetings to Sicilia. Is the rainy season already over? Hilmar -- http://www.hilmar-preusse.de.vu/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
