On 21.03.05 Paul van Tilburg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 09:08:54AM +0100, Hilmar Preusse wrote: > > On 21.01.05 Paul van Tilburg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Hi, [ ~/texmf -> ~/.texmf by default, refused ] > > > Yes... but for me dot-dirs are dirs that need not to be seen in > > > normal operation. I have themes in .themes, icons in .icons, > > > skins in .xmms. By far not everything is config in dot-dirs. > > > Own packages, bibrefs and stuff are more meta-data and not your > > > real documents, stored music, mail, etc. ergo in dot-dirs, for > > > me. > > > > > > But you all have answered my question. The answer is rather > > > not, ok then. > > > > > Is it Ok to close that bug then? I use myself ~/.texmf as user > > texmf-tree, but this is configurable. > > If not for example both can be supported, it's ok with me. > Yes, of course we could just define another TEXMF-tree, called DOTHOMETEXMF, but I think thats surplus. Putting just a small dot into the definition of HOMETEXMF should not be that hard to do.. Regards, Hilmar -- sigmentation fault -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]