On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 11:33:12AM +0100, Robert Millan [ackstorm] wrote: > On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 10:55:55AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > > My point is that if we don't figure that out satisfactorily in time, we > > > could > > > just enable the Composite extension, which sounds fairly safe, and seems > > > to be > > > enough for Intel cards. And Intel happens to be the card brand we have > > > the > > > best driver support for (compared to a RE'd driver for ATI and nothing for > > > nVidia), so focusing on it makes sense to me. > > > > Yes, that should be mostly safe at this point. The only exception that > > comes to mind offhand is that fglrx disables the DRI when Composite is > > enabled. > > If we have to choose between optimizing for free drivers that work sanely > (either intel or radeon) and non-free drivers that are partly broken, I > think it's clear what is better. > > Ok with enabling Composite by default then?
Yeah, I'm fine with that, although I think the better method is to enable it directly in the server by default. - David Nusinow -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]