hi On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 12:23:28AM +0200, Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote: > I was just curious why the fuzzyocr3 package is only in experiemental, > and not uploaded to replace fuzzyocr in unstable? It seems ready to > replace what's in unstable and testing?
fuzzyocr3 depends on netpbm ; Debian contains only a reduced subset of netpbm, due to licensing issues ; for this reason, the Debian package is somewhat nonfunctional I need to find some time to study fuzzyocr3 in depth and to substitute all netpbm commands with other commands available in Debian ... but this is not easy a. -- Andrea Mennucc "The EULA sounds like it was written by a team of lawyers who want to tell me what I can't do, and the GPL sounds like it was written by a human being who wants me to know what I can do." Anonymous, http://www.securityfocus.com/columnists/420 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
