Package: acpi-support Version: 0.95-2 Severity: minor This package depends on a number of hardware-specific packages (radeontool, toshset). Shouldn't those be "recommends" or "suggests" rather than "depends" relations?
I'm also puzzled by the presence of xbase-clients, and wonder if laptop-detect is essential. I'm running on server. I'm not sure if acpi is going to do me any good; my motherboard (Intel 945PSN) definitely claims to support it and to have low power modes. Intel support had nothing useful to say about using it under Linux. I'd appreciate any clues on using acpi in this configuration as well (though that's not really part of the bug). Thanks. -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (990, 'stable'), (50, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-4-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages acpi-support depends on: ii acpid 1.0.4-7.1 Utilities for using ACPI power man ii dmidecode 2.9-1 Dump Desktop Management Interface ii finger 0.17-11 user information lookup program ii hdparm 7.6-1 tune hard disk parameters for high ii laptop-detect 0.12.1-0.1 attempt to detect a laptop ii libc6 2.6-2 GNU C Library: Shared libraries ii lsb-base 3.1-24 Linux Standard Base 3.1 init scrip ii powermgmt-base 1.29 Common utils and configs for power ii radeontool 1.5-5 utility to control ATI Radeon back ii toshset 1.72-5 Access much of the Toshiba laptop ii vbetool 0.7-1.1 run real-mode video BIOS code to a ii xbase-clients 1:7.2.ds2-2 miscellaneous X clients acpi-support recommends no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
