On Wed, 2007-09-05 at 17:58 +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > > > > according to /usr/share/doc/ladspa-sdk/example_plugins.html, plugins > > with the same functionality are also included in the cmt plugin > > set. thus i would propose to split this package in to two > > packages. one for providing the sdk and one for providing the demo > > plugins. thus it can be avoided that people have two functionally > > equivalent plugins installed on their machines, if they install both > > ladspa-sdk and cmt > > They are so small the difference is negligible.
negligible in technical or in usability terms? in technical terms i agree, but for usability it is less confusing, if a user can only select one white noise generator instead of having to select one of two generators, that are functionally equivalent but having different names and ladspa ids best, tim -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ: 96771783 http://tim.klingt.org Linux is like a wigwam: no windows, no gates, apache inside, stable.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
