On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 06:47:49PM +0100, Silvestre Zabala wrote: >> If no, shouldn't it? > Yes I think it should, other fs modules get loaded by the regular mount. > > But as long it isn't implemented I'd think the old workaround is a > pragmatic solution.
Yes; my primary worry was error messages, but as long as we've seemingly loaded a bogus "nfs4" module for years without anyone complaining, I think putting "nfs" back in place is a good idea. /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
