[ Resending with the CC to BTS. please keep it. ] On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 12:27:43PM +0100, Florian Kriener wrote: > On Sunday 03 February 2008 20:18:43 you wrote: > > > I'm a bit confused. Please, can you take a picture of that? With and > > > without commenting those three lines. > > > > > > And preferrably send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] This means more eyes will > > > look at your problem. > > > > Actually, please try 1.96+20080203-1 first. A number of possible causes > > for your problem have been fixed recently, and fallback code has been added > > for robustness. > > > > Please report not only if you get a usable bootloader, but also if it fires > > up graphical mode and whether it's using the debian background. > > 1.96+20080203-1 works so far. I get a usable bootloader. I.e. I get the good > old text menu in blue and white, no fancy graphics though, but that is not a > problem, not for me at least.
You mean in text mode? Sounds like fonts aren't loading properly. Please could you check why /usr isn't accessible from GRUB ? (use 'ls' in the grub console). -- Robert Millan <GPLv2> I know my rights; I want my phone call! <DRM> What use is a phone call… if you are unable to speak? (as seen on /.) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]