On Tuesday 05 February 2008 21:48:04 you wrote: > [ Resending with the CC to BTS. please keep it. ] > > On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 12:27:43PM +0100, Florian Kriener wrote: > > On Sunday 03 February 2008 20:18:43 you wrote: > > > > I'm a bit confused. Please, can you take a picture of that? With > > > > and without commenting those three lines. > > > > > > > > And preferrably send it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] This means more eyes > > > > will look at your problem. > > > > > > Actually, please try 1.96+20080203-1 first. A number of possible > > > causes for your problem have been fixed recently, and fallback code has > > > been added for robustness. > > > > > > Please report not only if you get a usable bootloader, but also if it > > > fires up graphical mode and whether it's using the debian background. > > > > 1.96+20080203-1 works so far. I get a usable bootloader. I.e. I get the > > good old text menu in blue and white, no fancy graphics though, but that > > is not a problem, not for me at least. > > You mean in text mode? Sounds like fonts aren't loading properly. Please > could you check why /usr isn't accessible from GRUB ? (use 'ls' in the > grub console).
Oh no, fonts do work actualy. At least it does not look like the same font the bios uses (it is more slim and finer). I just wanted to say, that I see no background image or anything like it. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
