Bas Wijnen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Autoconf is pretty stable,
This has not been the experience of many of us. I haven't had a lot of trouble fixing things for newer releases of Autoconf, but I definitely have seen issues. And the Autoconf 2.13 to 2.50 transition and all the subsequent instability was not that long ago. > so I suppose you're talking about automake. Because of its interface > instability, you should never depend on "automake", but always on > "automake1.10" (or whatever version you tested with). Just FYI: windlord:~> apt-cache policy automake1.10 automake1.10: Installed: (none) Candidate: (none) Version table: windlord:~> apt-cache policy automake automake: Installed: 1:1.10.1-2 Candidate: 1:1.10.1-2 Version table: 1:1.10.1-3 0 500 http://exodus.stanford.edu unstable/main Packages *** 1:1.10.1-2 0 990 http://exodus.stanford.edu testing/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]