Dear python-glpk and python-cvxopt maintainers, I am bringing to your attention Bug#469732, filed against libglpk0 version 4.27-1. Since this version of glpk, MathPROG support in GLPK has been activated. This results in pulling a series of dependent packages related to iodbc and mysql. I am contacting you because your packages depend on libglpk0.
I am thinking about generating two separate library packages from the glpk source and I am wondering which would be the best naming scheme. These are the options I am considering: with MathPROG without MathPROG 1st option libglpk0 libglpk-light0 2nd option libglpk-mathprog0 libglpk0 Which would be more appropriate? -- Rafael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]