On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 10:39:34PM +0100, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> You are absolutely right. I will consider producing two independent library
> packages, one with MathPROG support and the other without. I do not know
> whether this will be possible, though. In case it is possible, which naming
> scheme would you suggested? We could have:
>
> with MathPROG without MathPROG
> 1st option libglpk0 libglpk-light0
> 2nd option libglpk-mathprog0 libglpk0
>
> Which would be better?
Just for the record, I don't think this is a good idea. It makes the
package more complicated, users have to waste time with checking out
what they need, while 99.99% will not care about 5M of disk space that
cost about 0.1 cent.
Falk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
