severity 470904 important thanks Max Alekseyev wrote: >> And it's not "grave" either because if it happened for loads of people >> it would have been reported ealier. > > The "grave" description does not say anything about the minimum number of > people required to report the bug of this severity.
Irrelevant. It's common practice (established by former RMs) that bugs which only affect a fraction of people and are not reproducible are not grave. For example: bugs caused by fglrx or nvidias binary-only drivers are not fixable in any case; should bugs ike this (which would often be bugs in those drivers) block unrelated packages? No. > I cannot reproduce this bug on my debian-amd64, but it is 100% reproducible > on debian-i386. Which I maybe cannot test. (In a chroot you'd have the amd64 X server anyway). Let's see what the fixed X server brings, if it fixes it it's not a bug in the openoffice.org packages anyway and so it should not hold up the important updates from 2.4 to reach testing. Regards, Renevu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
