On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 09:48:40PM +0200, Eddy Petrișor wrote: >>> Lars Lindner wrote: >> Nonetheless I identified the problem. You do massively mark posts >> as important (flagged). Which is not forbidden, but was totally >> unexpected by me when I implemented the merging algorithm. > > Heh :-) . I usually do that so I can come back to them at any time I want > to do read about the subject of the post. Is a way of archiving for me > (since I saw is he only way to make liferea keep those posts from being > lost into nothingness). > >> Flagged items do have the property of never being dropped from > > Which is good :-), from my PoV. > >> cache, but at the same moment we have a cache limit that the merging >> algorithm has to cope with. And the current calculation is simple: if the >> cache limit is 100 (like in your case and per default) and there are 100 >> (or more) flagged items that must never be dropped, then there is just >> no room to add new items. > > kaboom :-) > >> As a temporary workaround you should increase the cache limit for >> all affected feeds (like the Debian Planet feed). > > I have, but it seems it already "lost" some of the items of the day... > I'll probably change the limit first, then upgrade once more to the new > format ;-) .
If this works for you, please let me know. I'll then downgrade this report's severity but leave it open as a hint for others. > (BTW, I'll probably send another BR about it disrupting with my desire to > have low battery consumption since it does polling and wakes up the CPU > rather often.) Does it? We had a round of updates back in 1.2 dealing with this. According to powertop we got down to a rather acceptable level, IIRC.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
