On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 7:02 PM, Lucas Nussbaum
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  > What about doing it only if the output is a terminal?
>
>  Because no other command does that currently (you could argue for ls to
>  do that as well, for example).

One has to be the first, right?

> + it would break the workflow where you
>  test a command in a terminal, then add it to a shell script.
>
>  Also, that's clearly not somewhere Debian should diverge from upstream,
>  but maybe the upstream devs have another opinion?

Do they read this BTS?



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to