-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 James Westby wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm tempted to tag this wontfix, anyone object to that? Should we > forward upstream first? I feel we know the arguments already, but > they may just see it as an oversight and want to fix it. Opinions? This made me wonder - would it perhaps make sense to have bzr-launchpad as a separate binary package?
Cheers, Jelmer -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQCVAwUBSDlhUwy0JeEGD2blAQKpsQP/WaGvH5iZlhDhSgWpLqXc4UyueFxfvseF nIWGZY2sn5RxlWUqFi3FcbjUbm2078m39f5jHGP74O3LhE0E6PSEQrNVuorxErgD OgRupeQbQjF1CnsFCYiVHDkpP16T5CPqfrZEfb5CtrqVtehZ7JHeET5sC63jKeoP vtp3mL1M0mY= =pe10 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]